Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_17.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:26:17
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.4731 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.4214 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.7061 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6349 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.6122 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5767 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   5.0294 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.8780 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.1490 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7853 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.6059 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4741 minutes

ans =

    12

UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
ACUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.94, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.88, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.51, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -8.00, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.88, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.32, deficit  0.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.31, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.82, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUCA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.26, deficit  1.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.45, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CACUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGCCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGGUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCGU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.15, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUGC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.82, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UUAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GAGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.13, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
CAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.45, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CUCCG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
CACGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUGC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.82, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AUUAU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.09, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
AGUGU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.78, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.74, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GAUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_56387.1,  5 NTs,                 AUUUU,score      -6.25, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55                 
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAACG 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.02, deficit  5.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.38, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.23, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAUCGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.49, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
AGAAAU 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAUUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.03, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CACAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.55, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UGGAAA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.96, deficit  6.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -8.50, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.55, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUGGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.93, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
GAGGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AGUAUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAUG 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.56, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGCCAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -7.75, deficit  5.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
GUUCAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUGCAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score     -10.57, deficit  5.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGACGC 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.14, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAUGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -4.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
UGAUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.11, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AUCUUU 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.93, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.84, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AUGUCU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.94, deficit  1.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.32, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
ACCACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.38, deficit  1.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUGUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.72, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UGCUAA 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score     -10.08, deficit  8.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.55, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CGUUCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGAGAU 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.15, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
ACACGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.97, deficit  0.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UAGUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -8.31, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAAUGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.60, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUGAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.29, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GUUGGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
GCGAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.67, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.33, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UCGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -7.80, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.27, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GAGUCC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -3.89, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGAAC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.63, deficit  6.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.32, deficit -0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
UGCGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.72, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.69, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GAAGCC 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.41, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.39, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCUUAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -7.10, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UGUCUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -7.41, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
UGGAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_77081.1,  5 NTs,               UGAAAAG,score      -5.91, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35             
CCUAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.35, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
UUGAUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUCCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -9.91, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAGCCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.96, deficit  2.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UUGCUGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.84, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.29, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GAGGAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.58, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
UUACGAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AUAAAAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.53, deficit  3.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CGCACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score     -10.40, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AGAUCAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.96, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAUCGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAUUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.61, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCGAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -9.52, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUUAGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.64, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGGUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -12.04, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CAGCGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -4.80, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUCAAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.98, deficit  1.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AGGAAGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.22, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUUUCUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -5.82, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CUAACUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -4.65, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGGAAAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.17, deficit  1.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AAAAGAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.30, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GUAAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -4.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
GAAAUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UUUUUUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.73, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
UGUAUGA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -6.43, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CACGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -8.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCCUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
GGAUAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.33, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UGGAUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.51, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGUCGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -9.81, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
CCUCUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -5.29, deficit  0.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.77, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GAUUAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -9.19, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GCCUACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -7.14, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UGAUAGA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
AUCCAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.73, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUUCUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.15, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGGAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AAAAGAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.30, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GUGAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.07, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CAUGAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.62, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGUCUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.91, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
AUCUCAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -8.13, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGAAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.99, deficit  1.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.92, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UAAUUAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.88, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GACUUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.97, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GAAGAUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.85, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GGAAGAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -5.90, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CUAAGGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.92, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGAAGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.19, deficit  6.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
UAAAAAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23481.4,  7 NTs,              GAAACAUC,score      -7.44, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35               
CAUGAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -8.17, deficit  3.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CUUACAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
UUCAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score     -10.56, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CUUUGACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.15, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CGUAAAGG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.62, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGGAUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score     -10.54, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCGCGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -12.21, deficit  7.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GCUGUAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_18495.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.10, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGUUGUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.71, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGUAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCGAAGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
GGCCGCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
AGGAGCUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -13.64, deficit  8.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
UUUGUUAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.83, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AAUACAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.01, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUAUUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.28, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUCAUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -6.40, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
CAACUGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.19, deficit  3.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GGCCAAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.63, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
GGCCCCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.90, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UGAUCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -8.23, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CGGAUUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.64, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUUGGAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.61, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAAAGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.08, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGAUCAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -6.08, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CUGGAGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -10.74, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CGUUUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
AGAGUAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.96, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GGUAUAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.24, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
UUAACAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -8.88, deficit  6.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GGAAACCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.85, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGGCGCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.65, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAGAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.94, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UUACGUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.03, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.08, deficit  1.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGCAAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.15, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUCAUUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.13, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
AUAAGAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -7.02, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGUCAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -9.02, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GGCAAGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.00, deficit  1.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGAAGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.19, deficit  6.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CCUCAGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -9.64, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
GCGGAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -9.73, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CGGAAUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -5.93, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GUUGAAAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -6.89, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GAGUAUGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.17, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UGCCCUAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.74, deficit  2.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGAAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.98, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GUCAAAAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -6.67, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CGACUGGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.26, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGUGUCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score     -11.93, deficit  7.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGUGUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.89, deficit  2.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GCAAUAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UGAACGUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.13, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGCUUAACC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -8.47, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GUCACAGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.72, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUACCUAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -11.13, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
UGGAAAAGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -8.38, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CGGUGUGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score      -8.96, deficit  1.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
AGACCAAAU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.91, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAAGUCCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.50, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGCGCUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -13.90, deficit  5.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGCCUUAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAUAUGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GGUUCGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -9.38, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CAGCUAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -7.03, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CAACUUGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.23, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CCUAAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -8.88, deficit  4.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGAGGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.47, deficit  3.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
AGCAAAAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.81, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GUCAACCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.65, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUAAGUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -10.72, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCAUCUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -9.50, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CGAGGUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UAAAGGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -13.28, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GCGAAGAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.51, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGUGAUGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.57, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGAAGAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -9.92, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CGGCGGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.17, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAACGGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.75, deficit  2.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGUAGGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUAACUUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -5.78, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGGAAACUU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -9.46, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
GGCAUAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -10.99, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGAACGAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.00, deficit  4.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.89, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUGAAACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -10.99, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
UGUUCCCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.16, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGCAAUUG 1  Matches 11; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -7.72, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGUCAAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -8.13, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGCAAUGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GGGACUUAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -11.70, deficit  8.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAUUGCUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.72, deficit  5.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAACAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -12.11, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UACCAAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.93, deficit  8.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUUAUUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -13.72, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GUUAGAAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -9.86, deficit  7.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GAGGGAUUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -12.81, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAGAUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -13.67, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -8.59, deficit  0.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CUUGGGAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score      -9.26, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAUAAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -14.23, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GGGUCCCCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.42, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUAAAGAACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.93, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGUCUCUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.59, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CACCGUGAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -13.62, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.96, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGUUAAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.17, deficit  6.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GGAAAGGCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.82, deficit  4.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
ACCGUUGAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.53, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
AGAUUUCAUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -9.04, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGCCACGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.99, deficit  6.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUCCUAAACU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -8.29, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CUUGUACAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.58, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.01, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
UUUAGGUUCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.77, deficit  8.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCUAUAAAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -12.38, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AAUUUGGUAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -10.82, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GGUAGGUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.65, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGCCUGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.84, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGAUUGUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.90, deficit  7.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGAUCACAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.40, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CUUGAGGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score      -9.34, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GAACGCUUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score      -9.54, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CCCUGAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.88, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GGACAAAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.06, deficit  6.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CUCAUUCGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.10, deficit  6.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CCCGGGGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.53, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGUCCAAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.07, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUCCCUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.80, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUUGCGACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -12.15, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGAAAGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.46, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
UGUCAACGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.09, deficit  6.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUAGAUACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.68, deficit  9.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.53, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAGGAAUGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.47, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGAAGUCACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.49, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGCAAGACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -11.15, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAAAUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.19, deficit  4.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGUGACGAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.96, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAUGCAGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -10.88, deficit  4.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CUAACGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CUUAACCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -12.37, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGAACUUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.16, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
AAAACACCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.29, deficit  7.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUUUGUUCUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -9.99, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
UUCACGUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -12.61, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCCGAACCAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.09, deficit  4.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
AGUUGAGUUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.72, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGACAGAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.36, deficit  8.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUUCAAAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.91, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUUUAGGAGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.22, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.64, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUUCGUGUUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score      -9.11, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGUGCGAGAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.95, deficit  3.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGAUCCUCUAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -16.01, deficit  8.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAACCAACAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -11.75, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GGGUCUUACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -11.30, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CAGAAAUAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CCUCGGAUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.11, deficit  6.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GAGAGGACGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -12.37, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CUUCAAGGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.09, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGUUAUAUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -10.98, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUCACAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.84, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CGUAAUCUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -14.30, deficit  8.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GUUGAAAUGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -12.98, deficit  4.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
AUAAGAGGUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.96, deficit  4.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UUGAAAAUAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.39, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGGGUCUAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.82, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GGUGGACGGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.50, deficit  6.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.09, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAAUGCGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.99, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCUGAAAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.70, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAAAUGGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.62, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGAAAGCCCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.98, deficit  7.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUAAGCUAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -10.80, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CCUUUCAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -8.53, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUGCAUCGUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.82, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
CGUUCUCGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.04, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
GUCAGCGCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.59, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GCUGGUGGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.54, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GUGCGAAGUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -14.28, deficit  8.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGCGCGUUGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -13.99, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.53, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
GAAAAAGGUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GUGGCGAAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.81, deficit  8.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGUCGGGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.92, deficit  6.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UGGAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -12.18, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.79, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAGACGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.78, deficit  9.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCUGGCAGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.62, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.78, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGAAAGAGUAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.54, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAAGGAAGAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.63, deficit  4.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.32, ed 99, 5 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAAACUUGGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -15.03, deficit  6.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.31, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CUCUGGUUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -12.33, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
UAUCCUUUGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -12.94, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAUUGAAAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.24, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.22, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGAUUCGGGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.58, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.58, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCAGAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.36, deficit  6.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UACUGCAGAUAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.31, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.74, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CGACGGCCUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -18.22, deficit 11.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAGAUCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.67, deficit  8.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUUUCUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.86, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GGAUUCCUCUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -18.07, deficit  8.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
CCUCGUUUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.35, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GUGCCUAAUAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -12.00, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGAUGGUGGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -12.32, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GGUUUCAAGUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.63, deficit  8.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CAAUUUAUUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.86, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CGAGGAUAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.72, deficit  3.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGAGAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.02, deficit  6.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGGAGGCGGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -16.28, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
GCAAUUCGGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -14.22, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.41, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
UGAGAAAGUAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.76, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUAAAAGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -14.85, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CCGAAAAUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -14.85, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
UGCACCCUUUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.76, deficit  4.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.72, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAAGUCAUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.74, deficit  5.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.10, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAGAAAAAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89082.1, 11 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -13.50, deficit  8.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35   
GGAAAUUGAAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -14.88, deficit  8.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GAAAGAGCUUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.81, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.09, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
GAGAGAAGGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.1, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -15.41, deficit  8.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55
CCGGUGCCUGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.16, deficit  4.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.26, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAUCCCUCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -16.44, deficit  7.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.60, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
GGCCACAAAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -15.22, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.60, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GGAAGCGGCUUGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.99, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
CACGUGGGAAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.1, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -13.68, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55
CGACAAGAGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -17.92, deficit  9.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CUUUUCAAGGUUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_03603.1, 15 NTs,       AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU,score     -15.06, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.54, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 81.2941	 69.7647	4
5	100.0000	 90.7059	 47.0588	23
6	100.0000	 86.4706	 45.7647	60
7	 99.8824	 50.5882	 13.2941	51
8	 99.2941	 26.7059	  3.7647	46
9	 99.2941	 19.5294	  1.7647	68
10	 95.1765	  9.0588	  0.2353	41
11	 83.1765	  4.1176	  0.0000	42
12	 45.1765	  0.7059	  0.0000	23
13	 17.5294	  0.2353	  0.0000	12
14	  7.1765	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.2941	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.5882	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.3529	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.1176	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  67 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 166 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 166 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 202 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 212 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 213 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 221 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 232 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 234 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 236 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 241 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 251 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 256 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 257 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 265 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 293 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 295 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 296 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 302 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 305 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 314 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 318 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 332 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 356 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 372 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 374 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 375 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 376 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 376 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 379 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 381 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 382 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 385 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 407 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 409 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 439 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 464 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 477 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 494 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 509 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 522 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 523 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 527 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 527 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 537 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 537 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 545 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 557 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 597 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 603 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 613 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 616 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 641 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 658 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 739 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 744 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 761 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 801 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 809 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 878 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 914 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 927 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 944 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 955 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 983 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 1031 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 1063 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 1067 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1273 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1387 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1599 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.4608%
Number of models giving false positives is 301 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.57
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.39
